Linked by Thom Holwerda on Wed 31st Oct 2007 20:06 UTC
Thread beginning with comment 282094
To view parent comment, click here.
To read all comments associated with this story, please click here.
To view parent comment, click here.
To read all comments associated with this story, please click here.
RE[3]: Is this the best they can do
by John Blink on Wed 31st Oct 2007 21:08
in reply to "RE[2]: Is this the best they can do"
RE[4]: Is this the best they can do
by angryrobot on Wed 31st Oct 2007 21:10
in reply to "RE[3]: Is this the best they can do"






Member since:
2006-04-26
I don't think anybody is making excuses, because there is nothing anybody can do against a program that the user deliberately installs. I suppose if Safari automatically downloaded and installed it without the user's knowledge, then Apple could definitely be taken to task for it.

However, it does highlight the issue (at least to me) that the "Download 'safe' files" option should not be checked by default in Safari. Still, even with this option checked all it does is download and mount the image. Though that is definitely scary in itself, it still doesn't hurt the user's system until they install the program. This is far different from say, the drive-by download and install BHOs and ActiveX controls that plagued IE on Windows for so long.
The article does say that one thing the user can do to protect themselves is to buy the Intego VirusBarrier X4 which incidentally is available from the company that issued the release