To read all comments associated with this story, please click here.
At the very least you can play around with the LiveCD version, though that is very limited and is based on an older version of eCS (1.2).
http://www.ecomstation.com/democd/
Then don't install Win-eCS - it's optional.
Edited 2007-11-03 20:25
Win-os/2 or win-eCS is not the root of the royalty problem to micrsoft, but rather the fact that os/2 started its life as a joint venture between ibm and microsoft. So actually version 1 and 1.2 of os/2 shared alot with MS products. Also NT was developed based partially off of os/2, so there is alot more entanglement there than just a win 3.1 emulator.
If you seriously think that eCS is comparable to an flavor of Win9x in terms of general features, I would politely suggest that you don't have much clue about eCS's capabilities as an operating system. :-)
The two OSes existed at roughly the same time (OS/2 2.0 actually predated Win95 to market by three years), but OS/2 2.x and later was one or two generations ahead of Microsoft's Windows 9.x line in almost all respects, and it was (and is) also arguably ahead of Windows NT and its successors in several respects (OS/2 is much smaller, faster, far more responsive under load, has a better native scripting language, has a MUCH more flexible desktop, has better legacy software support in general, etc.).





Member since:
2006-08-18
eComStation has an identity problem.
The company who sells eComStation believes it's worth $259 plus $89 for an annual subscription to software updates. Its hard enough for Windows Vista to justify such cost.
So how does an OS/2 dervivative with a feature set competitive to maybe Windows 95 SR 2.5 do it?
Edited 2007-11-03 08:15