Linked by Thom Holwerda on Sat 3rd Nov 2007 23:56 UTC, submitted by rx182
Thread beginning with comment 282687
To read all comments associated with this story, please click here.
To read all comments associated with this story, please click here.
Yep. Without a task bar and a start button, it just not all encompassing.
Stop being an idiot; here is Joe average; Joe average takes home the computer, he has some games and applications he wants to load on. The don't work. Sends the computer back to the store because it is 'broken'.
The end users don't care how you wrap Linux, until it has the level of hardware and software support as Windows, its not going to go anywhere near the desktop. Either face reality and fix up the, quite frankly, garbage opensource applications or admit defeat and hand the market to Microsoft.
Yep. Without a task bar and a start button, it just not all encompassing.
Clearly you're clueless as to what binds a desktop and its applications together. Don't worry. You're obviously not the only one.
I cannot see how or why this whole thing is any different to what we've had before.
Edited 2007-11-04 12:49






Member since:
2005-07-06
This has reminded me of every single alternative desktop we've ever seen since the JavaStations and Network Computer. They're just clueless as to how to put together an all encompassing desktop. Putting together a loosely integrated desktop full of separate components, and then trying to sell it to a 'niche' market, is just not going to fly.
People have been telling us for years that there are niche markets where these alternative desktops can go. What happened? PCs got cheaper, and people continued to use Windows.