Linked by Thom Holwerda on Thu 8th Nov 2007 17:33 UTC, submitted by WillM
In the News One year after sealing their surprise alliance, Novell and Microsoft have announced an expansion of their technical collaboration to 'link together the existing Windows and Linux frameworks'. The firms will extend their existing collaboration to focus on virtualisation, standards-based management, directory and identity federation and document format compatibility. As part of this process, Microsoft said that both companies are 'now working closely' at the Microsoft and Novell Interoperability Lab in Massachusetts.
Thread beginning with comment 283716
To view parent comment, click here.
To read all comments associated with this story, please click here.
RE[6]: Good for Novell!
by Teknoenie on Thu 8th Nov 2007 22:08 UTC in reply to "RE[5]: Good for Novell!"
Teknoenie
Member since:
2007-06-07

"The trouble with this is if it turns out they are NOT unsubstantiated then linux in the business world would crumble overnight."

I believe this is incorrect. The BSDs went through something similar in the early 90s. The infriginging lines were removed and BSD carried on. I think the same would apply to GNU/Linux, however, companies such as Suse and RedHat may have to pay some some sort of damages. The code is out there, it's easy to remove and create new open implementations, but the user base would suffer throughout the transition.

Of course, all this is purely on the speculations of Microsoft stating GNU/Linux is infringing without ponying up the proof.

Reply Parent Score: 2

RE[7]: Good for Novell!
by sbergman27 on Thu 8th Nov 2007 22:21 in reply to "RE[6]: Good for Novell!"
sbergman27 Member since:
2005-07-24

"""
I believe this is incorrect. The BSDs went through something similar in the early 90s.
"""

No. And this is an *extremely* important point to understand. The BSD lawsuit was about copyrights. The threats OSS faces today are about patents. That is a *completely* different scenario. One cannot simply rewrite sections of code to avoid infrindements. Whereas copyrights are about copying lines of code, patents are about implementing *ideas*. If we are found to be infringing, for the sake of argument, upon a patent which covers having a pointing indicator on the screen which one can control with ones hand, we cannot simply rewrite the code. We must stop using mouse pointers altogether and find a completely different way of interacting with the desktop.

Being called into question on copyrights is, at worst, a major inconvenience. Being found to violate certain patents could be absolutely *devastating*.

What is protecting us now is not necessarily that we are not infringing upon any patents, but that for various reasons, few actual players in the industry, short of pure-play patent trolls, dare to use their patents offensively.

If patent armageddon were, in fact, unleashed some day, OSS would be just a devastated as the closed source companies. Worse, perhaps, since other than Novell, we don't have much, if any, in the way of cross-licensing deals, and are not in a position to make them in order to save our skins.

Reply Parent Score: 6

RE[8]: Good for Novell!
by Almafeta on Fri 9th Nov 2007 03:39 in reply to "RE[7]: Good for Novell!"
Almafeta Member since:
2007-02-22

One cannot simply rewrite sections of code to avoid [patent] infringements.


Yes, you can, and companies often do.

Reply Parent Score: 1