Linked by Thom Holwerda on Tue 13th Nov 2007 16:17 UTC, submitted by diegocg
Thread beginning with comment 284271
To read all comments associated with this story, please click here.
To read all comments associated with this story, please click here.
RE: It's no surprise to see free software on top
by lemur2 on Wed 14th Nov 2007 08:06
in reply to "It's no surprise to see free software on top"
Free software has a clear advantage at this subject, since supercomputing architecture would make it almost impossible to pay the number of licenses needed to build such monsters otherwise
This reasoning only applies for clusters.
From the article: "A total of 406 systems are labeled as clusters, making this the most common architecture in the TOP500 with a stable share of 81.2 percent."
Only a cluster system would require a large number of licenses.
Windows writes itself out of contention to run on the 18.8% of top 500 supercomputers which are not clusters because neither the x86 nor the x86_64 architectures are supercomputer CPUs.
Or, stated another way, Linux wins this race because of two main reasons:
(1) it doesn't have per-copy license fees, and
(2) it is way, way more portable to different architectures.
Nothing scales the way that Linux does.
Edited 2007-11-14 08:11
RE[2]: It's no surprise to see free software on top
by puenktchen on Wed 14th Nov 2007 08:24
in reply to "RE: It's no surprise to see free software on top"






Member since:
2006-07-26
Free software has a clear advantage at this subject, since supercomputing architecture would make it almost impossible to pay the number of licenses needed to build such monsters otherwise ... well, apart that they run quick and reliable, of course.