Linked by Thom Holwerda on Thu 8th Sep 2005 09:10 UTC, submitted by george
FreeBSD One of the most useful tidbits from the basket of code released into the public domain this year by Sun Microsystems is likely to make it to the FreeBSD platform. DTrace is currently being ported to FreeBSD by Devon O'Dell, a FreeBSD developer working for OffMyServer, a US-based vendor which sells servers running BSD and Linux variants.
Thread beginning with comment 28464
To view parent comment, click here.
To read all comments associated with this story, please click here.
RE: CDDL
by on Thu 8th Sep 2005 12:22 UTC in reply to "CDDL"

Member since:

> I don’t see why Sun couldn’t have been nicer to its
> neighbors and license OpenSolaris either under the
> GPL or under the BSD license.

Simple answer: Because it's their property and because they can. And because they don't like the GPL, which I understand and which they don't need to justify because it's their property and nobody else's.

> My only issue with it thus far is the use of the
> phrase "intellectual property".

Why? Because of the wording? That's not sensible. Intellectual property is a reality, regardless of how you call it. $GPLware is the intellectual property of $GPLware's author, period. Call it whatever you like and let others call it what it is.

Another question: Why do discussions about Sun's Free Software projects always end in a licensing discussion instead of technical things? Are there any FSF lobbyists or even GNU zealots among us?

Reply Parent Bookmark Score: 4

RE[2]: CDDL
by orestes on Thu 8th Sep 2005 13:39 in reply to "RE: CDDL"
orestes Member since:
2005-07-06

Why? Because of the wording? That's not sensible.

Because it perputuates the concept that the rights granted by copyright, patent, trademark, and trade secret laws are somehow tied to those given by laws governing physical property.

Reply Parent Bookmark Score: 0

RE[3]: CDDL
by John Nilsson on Thu 8th Sep 2005 21:37 in reply to "RE[2]: CDDL"
John Nilsson Member since:
2005-07-06

Not to mention that many illegal acts involving physical property is criminal which is not the case regarding "intelecrual property".

Reply Parent Bookmark Score: 1