Linked by Thom Holwerda on Wed 14th Nov 2007 19:49 UTC
Thread beginning with comment 284692
To view parent comment, click here.
To read all comments associated with this story, please click here.
To view parent comment, click here.
To read all comments associated with this story, please click here.
News
Linked by Thom Holwerda on 05/22/13 13:38 UTC
Linked by Thom Holwerda on 05/22/13 13:30 UTC, submitted by JRepin
Linked by Thom Holwerda on 05/21/13 22:06 UTC
Linked by Thom Holwerda on 05/21/13 21:45 UTC
Linked by Thom Holwerda on 05/21/13 15:53 UTC
Linked by Thom Holwerda on 05/20/13 22:43 UTC
Linked by Thom Holwerda on 05/20/13 21:50 UTC
Linked by Thom Holwerda on 05/19/13 23:15 UTC
Linked by Thom Holwerda on 05/19/13 23:11 UTC, submitted by Drumhellar
Linked by Thom Holwerda on 05/18/13 21:06 UTC
More News »
Sponsored Links



Member since:
2007-09-27
no, i'm just saying that they have similar goals. What i'm trying to convey is something like during the cold war, china and russia had similar goals/beliefs, so why didn't they become one nation and become more powerful? Just because something is similar to something else doesn't mean it is a good idea, or possible, for them to become one entity.
edit: i picked china and russia because of their easily identified similarities in terms of goals/ideals, not as some sort of social commentary
Edited 2007-11-15 21:57