Linked by Thom Holwerda on Sun 18th Nov 2007 15:46 UTC
Thread beginning with comment 285059
To view parent comment, click here.
To read all comments associated with this story, please click here.
To view parent comment, click here.
To read all comments associated with this story, please click here.
RE[4]: Yet another thing not invented by Jobs/Apple.
by phoenix on Tue 20th Nov 2007 01:29
in reply to "RE[3]: Yet another thing not invented by Jobs/Apple."
Yes, progman.exe was included in Windows 95. However, it broke a lot of built-in features like the recycle bin and network neighbourhood, as these were hooks into explorer.exe.
You could also run a lot of different shells on Windows 9x (Litestep and Darkstep being the two most popular). But, these also broke things that were hooked directly into explorer.exe.
If MS had properly separated the GUI shell from system services (like in Win3.x), then running alternate shells would have been a much smoother/easier thing to do.




Member since:
2005-07-06
heh, never used windows 3.1 much. it was dos most of the time for me.
but i think you could run progman.exe as a alternate shell on win95 (maybe even 98).