This is the sixth article in a series on common usability and graphical user interface related terms [part I | part II | part III | part IV | part V]. On the internet, and especially in forum discussions like we all have here on OSNews, it is almost certain that in any given discussion, someone will most likely bring up usability and GUI related terms - things like spatial memory, widgets, consistency, Fitts' Law, and more. The aim of this series is to explain these terms, learn something about their origins, and finally rate their importance in the field of usability and (graphical) user interface design. In part VI, we focus on the dock.
To view parent comment, click here.
To read all comments associated with this story, please click here.
Member since:2005-07-11
You have just described the RISC OS Icon Bar, from 1987 -- preceding NeXTSTEP by two years.
Ok. I know RISC OS by reputation only. Thom talked about this in the article, but I wasn't entirely sure how the Icon Bar worked. I agree that Acorn had the first dock, but they used a different term for it.
The argument in my first post was that OS X and NeXTSTEP are evolutions of the same system, and that this is where the term "Dock" comes from. Claiming that WindowMaker had a dock before OS X makes no sense since wmaker is actually trying its best to copy the look and feel of NeXT.
My experience is that Windows 95 and Windows 98 fit this description -- I could drag application icons to the taskbar and if an application was running a rectangle with an icon and the applicatin's title would appear. The Gnome and KDE taskbars exhibit the same behaviour.
I don't understand any of this. Sorry.
Is it an advantage to lack an indicator for an active application that one forgot to drag to the dock?
Not "forgot", but "chose not to". Let's take a look at a screenshot, please click the preview to see the full size image;
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Image:NeXTSTEP_desktop.jpg
Here you see a user running approximately 10 applications. Each of these are represented with an appicon, which is by default positioned on a free spot at the bottom of the screen. The user has chosen to put some of the apps in his Dock, which means they have a completely fixed position across sessions. If he decides to "dock" another application, he can drag it either from the bottom of the screen or from a File Viewer.
Apple changed this by putting in the Dock not only the fixed elements, but also the ones that ran across the bottom edge in NeXTSTEP. This looks like a small change perhaps, but it means that the Dock now changes all by itself, while in the old system the user had 100% control. It also blurs the concept slightly since you have gone from "docking" something to selecting "Keep in dock" on stuff that is already in there.
Member since:2006-11-12
I agree that Acorn had the first dock, but they used a different term for it.
I agree that RISC OS had a dock at least two years before NeXTSTEP, however, I say that the first dock was the strip along the bottom of the Windows 1.01 screen, in 1985. That strip contained the icons of minimized applications, and application windows could not overlap onto the strip. Of course, it would have been obvious to also include permanent icons on the strip, but, for some strange reason, the dock feature was immediately ditched by Microsoft before permanent icons were added.
Claiming that WindowMaker had a dock before OS X makes no sense since wmaker is actually trying its best to copy the look and feel of NeXT.
Okay. Let's not argue semantics. There were several *nix window managers that had docks/task-bars, before NeXTSTEP "became" OSX.
***My experience is that Windows 95 and Windows 98 fit this description -- I could drag application icons to the task-bar and if an application was running a rectangle with an icon and the application's title would appear. The Gnome and KDE task-bars exhibit the same behavior.***
I don't understand any of this. Sorry.
The task-bars in Windows 95 and 98 and in Gnome and KDE provide the same function as the docks in NeXTSTEP and OSX.
Apple changed this by putting in the Dock not only the fixed elements, but also the ones that ran across the bottom edge in NeXTSTEP. This looks like a small change perhaps, but it means that the Dock now changes all by itself, while in the old system the user had 100% control. It also blurs the concept slightly since you have gone from "docking" something to selecting "Keep in dock" on stuff that is already in there.
The task-bars just mentioned (and many not mentioned) provide both the NeXTSTEP and OSX functions you describe, and more: one can drag any icon (from both active and inactive applications) onto a reserved place on the edge of the screen, and the icons will stay there until they are manually removed. In addition, the titles and/or icons of active applications can appear on their own in this reserved space, *but the user can disable this function*. As an extra benefit, clicking on the active titles/icons one can manipulate "modes" of their applications (now I am beginning to see what google_ninja meant by "modes").
Edited 2007-11-19 18:33
"There's a disconnect between how Apple CEO Tim Cook sees his company's tax strategies and how some members of the US Senate view it. That became clearer than ever today after Cook and two other Apple executives testified before Congress, explaining why they're holding most of their international income in Irish subsidiaries like Apple Operations International, which declare no tax residency anywhere in the world. AOI hasn't filed a tax return anywhere in the world for the last five years, yet it earned $30 billion in income from 2009 to 2012, according to a Senate report released yesterday." Just because something is legal, doesn't mean it's just. Apple, Google, Microsoft, and many more - these companies might not be breaking any laws, but it's obvious to anyone that what they are doing is scummy.
The new WebKit Opera for Android has been released. "Opera 14 for Android is built on top of Chromium 26, with a total overhaul of the UI in native code, making it fit well with the latest Android design guidelines. Go get the build from Google Play or point your browser to m.opera.com, and give it a spin!"
The Verge pointed me to a blog post by Leap Motion - which reveals how their Kinect-like motion control works with Windows 8. "From the second you plug in your Leap Motion Controller, you'll be able to browse the web and interact with your computer just by moving your hands and fingers in the air. With Leap Motion technology and Windows, you can do everything that's possible with multi-touch inputs - without actually touching anything. This also means that existing applications in Windows 7 and 8 will respond to your natural hand and finger movements. Soon, we'll show you how Leap Motion will work with Mac OS X." Quite cool.
PocketNow interviews Marc Dillon, and there's an interesting note about why Jolla is keeping the display properties under wraps: "We're leaving some of those details out because we do understand that there are a lot of really big players in the market and they tend to take certain components in the market and dominate them. We created the ability to actually be able to run Sailfish on multiple hardware displays and be able to swap components, so this is part of the demand and supply planning phase. We are committed to this industrial design which is a 4.5-inch display, an 8 megapixel camera on the back and a front-facing camera at the front, and the exact specs of the display we'll provide when we're close to delivery." Something you rarely hear anything about.
"This is my NeXTstation Turbo Color booting the Mac System 7.1 Operating System using a hardware add-on called 'Daydream'. The Daydream has a Mac ROM and a few custom ICs in it and hooked up to the NeXTs DSP port. Turns your NeXT into a full fledged 68k powered Mac." So cool.
"The NetBSD Project is pleased to announce NetBSD 6.1, the first feature update of the NetBSD 6 release branch. It represents a selected subset of fixes deemed important for security or stability reasons, as well as new features and enhancements. Please note that all fixes in the prior security/bugfix updates (NetBSD 6.0.1 and 6.0.2) are also in 6.1."
"At the end of a week in which Electronic Arts confirmed it wasn't developing a thing for the Wii U, one of the software engineers in EA Sports' Canada studio, in a series of since-deleted tweets, disparaged the console as 'crap' and suggested Nintendo should give up on hardware altogether. 'The Wii U is crap. Less powerful than an Xbox 360. Poor online/store. Weird tablet', tweeted Bob Summerwill, listed as a senior software engineer at EA Canada, in a reply to a tweet posting a link about EA's no-Wii U news. 'Nintendo are walking dead at this point'." The Wii U is turning into the 21st century's Virtual Boy.
"In NixOS, the entire operating system - the kernel, applications, system packages, configuration files, and so on - is built by the Nix package manager from a description in a purely functional build language. The fact that it's purely functional essentially means that building a new configuration cannot overwrite previous configurations. Most of the other features follow from this." Interesting approach. A Linux distribution, sure, but with some very refreshing ideas about system configuration.
Appfour added, among other features, C/C++ support to its new version of AIDE. From Android-IDE, "Now you can write parts of your app or your whole app in C/C++ on your device. AIDE supports the Standard Android NDK toolchain (GCC 4.6 + Bionic, STL, ...). No changes are necessary if you want to build an app developed on a PC with Eclipse. C/C++ development is fully integrated: Build errors appear in the error list and files can easily be navigated to with Go to file. The editor supports C/C++ syntax highlighting."
Ars nails it: "The answer is that Google did announce what amounts to a fairly substantial Android update yesterday. They simply did it without adding to the update fragmentation problems that continue to plague the platform. By focusing on these changes and not the apparently-waiting-in-the-wings update to the core software, Google is showing us one of the ways in which it's trying to fix the update problem."
Member since:
2006-11-12
Today, the definition seems to be; an icon bar where the same icons are used both to show running apps and to launch them.
You have just described the RISC OS Icon Bar, from 1987 -- preceding NeXTSTEP by two years.
Traditional taskbars don't fit this description. So there is at least one difference right there.
My experience is that Windows 95 and Windows 98 fit this description -- I could drag application icons to the taskbar and if an application was running a rectangle with an icon and the applicatin's title would appear. The Gnome and KDE taskbars exhibit the same behaviour.
Well, in NeXTSTEP, nothing appeared in the Dock at all. You had to drag it there to dock it.
Is it an advantage to lack an indicator for an active application that one forgot to drag to the dock?
By "quicklaunch" I meant the Quick Launch toolbar.
Not familiar with the Quick Launch toolbar.
Edited 2007-11-19 09:47