Linked by Thom Holwerda on Sun 18th Nov 2007 15:28 UTC, submitted by JCooper
"Ever since I got the eeePC I've loved how easy it is to tinker with. Since I'm not a Linux guy, I dumped the Xandros preload and opted for Windows XP so I could use my EVDO USB datacard and blogging software easier, but I wondered could I install OSX on it? And, after trial and error - you can! The only problem is that the eeePC only supports SSE2 instead of the SSE3 that Leopard is coded for. Kind of a bummer, and will require some extra tinkering to coax the OS on the eeePC."
Thread beginning with comment 285194
To view parent comment, click here.
To read all comments associated with this story, please click here.
To view parent comment, click here.
To read all comments associated with this story, please click here.
Recent Original Stories
Recent Comments
Headlines
Random Comments
Random Stories
Random OS Link
Member since:
2005-07-06
It's not an "illegal manner" unless a court finds that it is - otherwise, the strongest accurate pejorative you use would be "acting in a manner that violates an EULA." Of course, it's already been pointed out numerous times that said EULA isn't even legally-valid in a large of part (most?) of the world. And even in the places where it's considered a valid contract, the actual legal-enforceability is pretty questionable.
Not a valid comparison - that would be a clear-cut violation of copyright law. A more comparable situation would be if someone posted instructions for (E.g.) using a VM to run a version of Vista which doesn't "allow" that usage in the EULA.