Linked by Thom Holwerda on Mon 19th Nov 2007 21:22 UTC, submitted by irbis
Thread beginning with comment 285301
To view parent comment, click here.
To read all comments associated with this story, please click here.
To view parent comment, click here.
To read all comments associated with this story, please click here.
RE[2]: I know this is not a poll
by xzgv on Tue 20th Nov 2007 00:23
in reply to "RE: I know this is not a poll"
"For my daily use, I prefer WindowMaker. Until today, I didn't found any window manager that is as fast, as customizable (especially in regards of keyboard bindings)... "
For a moment i thought you were taking about my primary window manager, Ratpoison; my secondary one is IceWM
Edited 2007-11-20 00:25
RE[2]: I know this is not a poll
by isaba on Tue 20th Nov 2007 15:09
in reply to "RE: I know this is not a poll"




Member since:
2006-10-08
"But I cannot resist telling you that one of my favourites windowmagers of all times is iceWM. I do like taskbars, and I find this is a ultra fast, flexible and very useful windowmanager. In fact, it is the one I use on a daily basus on an old PII/233MHz and it flies."
I can confirm this. IceWM is a great window manager and can be customized using themes and text based configuration files. I've used IceWM on a P1/150MHz with 64 MB RAM (later 128) and it made up a usable system.
Later on, I switched to XFCE 3 (on a P2/300MHz) and XFCE 4 on slower hardware. XFCE 3 was a good window manager for those users who were familiar with Solaris/CDE on their Sun boxes. XFCE 4 added lots of useful features without increasing the system to a pile of bloat.
For my daily use, I prefer WindowMaker. Until today, I didn't found any window manager that is as fast, as customizable (especially in regards of keyboard bindings) and as pleasant in look and feel as this relict from better times. :-)