Linked by Eugenia Loli-Queru on Mon 19th Nov 2007 08:01 UTC, submitted by Research Staff
Some testing by the exo.performance.network research staff shows that SP1 provides no measurable relief to users saddled with sub-par performance under Vista.
Thread beginning with comment 285592
To view parent comment, click here.
To read all comments associated with this story, please click here.
To view parent comment, click here.
To read all comments associated with this story, please click here.
RE[7]: i'd like to see them repeat the tests
by dreamlax on Tue 20th Nov 2007 21:47
in reply to "RE[6]: i'd like to see them repeat the tests"
Member since:2007-01-04
But you see, you did upgrade. So case closed.
I'm sorry, case closed how? People upgrade for all sorts of reasons; computers die, get written off, stolen or lost etc. I didn't "upgrade" at all, technically. I needed a laptop so I bought one second hand.
See, because of Vista, you have a nice grunty machine to do the tasks of what I expect a 4 year old computer to do just as well.
RE[8]: i'd like to see them repeat the tests
by gonzo on Tue 20th Nov 2007 22:03
in reply to "RE[7]: i'd like to see them repeat the tests"
Member since:2005-11-10
See, because of Vista, you have a nice grunty machine to do the tasks of what I expect a 4 year old computer to do just as well.
No, not because of Vista.
If Vista was not even released, I'd be still running that same configuration. And even more, as I said, I'd soon upgrade to quad-core and even more memory, better video card, etc. Vista or not, hardware is cheap these days.
Edited 2007-11-20 22:03
Recent Original Stories
Recent Comments
Headlines
Random Comments
Random Stories
Random OS Link
Member since:
2005-11-10
Certainly not the operating system I chose to use.
But you see, you did upgrade. So case closed.