Linked by Thom Holwerda on Wed 21st Nov 2007 13:53 UTC, submitted by poundsmack
Thread beginning with comment 285807
To read all comments associated with this story, please click here.
To read all comments associated with this story, please click here.
What are the advantages/differences of sun's CIFS implementation over Samba ?
One difference is that it is in kernel. Samba is all userland. The blog post above promises better integration with the rest of the OS and I would expect it to be faster once it matures (or now, who knows).
Now, why the NYT picked up on this, I have no idea.
Samba is all userland.
Yes, the Samba package is purely userspace, but it requires native kernel support at the VFS and FS levels.
Additionally, it's unclear that an in-kernel implementation of a network filesystem and transfer protocol is a great idea in the long-run. The trend these days tends to be toward pushing unnecessary functionality into userspace.
Now, why the NYT picked up on this, I have no idea.
It's an IDG thing. There are probably contractual obligations. Media collusion is a Good Thing(TM)...
Notice that all three sentences in the second paragraph end with "Sun said". Outstanding journalism...







Member since:
2006-01-18
What are the advantages/differences of sun's CIFS implementation over Samba ?