When computer company Apple announced that they were planning to make a phone, most pundits felt sure that Apple would produce something a bit different from the crowd. An Apple phone would have to be a plush, prestige unit and the product of a thoughtful design process.
To view parent comment, click here.
To read all comments associated with this story, please click here.
Member since:2005-07-11
If the iPhone ran Linux, the product wouldn't be so interesting any more. It's not the hardware that is the slick part, it's the software.
That said, I was puzzled when the iPhone arrived, and it was clear it did not support 3rd party apps. It's Cocoa based for crying out loud! Why don't they make that its greatest advantage? Well, in the last couple of months Apple has announced that this will change, so we'll see.
Member since:2006-09-01
OS X is a *ix, so the criticism that it isn't linux is kind of silly. Besides any utilities you'll miss can more then likely be installed via macports.
If they would allow access to a Terminal I'm sure you could get them to work.
"Mac OS X 10.4 has ruby and irb (interactive ruby) installed by default, so I was able to just type "irb" and follow along with the examples."
http://aplawrence.com/MacOSX/ruby_on_rails.html
http://www.google.com/search?hl=en&q=os+x+ruby&btnG=Google+Search
Member since:
2007-04-11
This wasn't really insulting at all. I thought it was a nice article and I agree with him...
...though if it ran linux (:-)) or allowed me to run all the ruby apps for dosage/plasma drug level/dosage interval calculators Ive written for work on it I might consider it...
Or Ill just wait for an eeepc and use my free Nokia phone that I got with my contract...
These are my choices just like the author had his. That is what is great about (semi)free markets...and technological evolution, like the theory Linus espouses...
Edited 2007-11-21 16:29