Linked by Thom Holwerda on Wed 21st Nov 2007 13:53 UTC, submitted by poundsmack
Thread beginning with comment 285918
To view parent comment, click here.
To read all comments associated with this story, please click here.
To view parent comment, click here.
To read all comments associated with this story, please click here.
Were Samba a MIT codebase, the bits which the Solaris codebase could use would be nice for Sun, but since Sun intends to integrate the code into their kernel, it's not possible.
You have heard of userspace and kernelspace separation, right, as Jeremy Allison has talked about getting APIs into Solaris' kernel for Samba?
Sun likes integrated solutions in it's products
I'm trying to contain my laughter as I read that, but I can't.







Member since:
2006-03-12
Not everyone is willing to accept the GPL just to save a few grand, especially when the intent is to make many more grand. Were Samba a MIT codebase, the bits which the Solaris codebase could use would be nice for Sun, but since Sun intends to integrate the code into their kernel, it's not possible. The choice is between using Samba and being forced to GPL their kernel, or making their own CIFS implementation and keeping their kernel the way they want it.
Since Sun chose not to GPL Solaris already, it's easy to see a reason for their not selecting integrating Samba into their kernel.
Sun likes integrated solutions in it's products, Samba doesn't do that - a part of this is it's portability, a part of that is it's userland basis, and a part of that is it's licence. C'est la vie.