Username or EmailPassword
I 100% with the person who made the initial comment. Within the article body the only thing stated was KDE's advancements and benefits above and beyond gnome. Then, within the summary, the reviewer says gnome is the best (ie better than kde) but makes no points to support such claims. This makes it obvious that the reviewer doesn't care to stick to facts which results in a poor review.
I can form my own opinion. I am interested in legitimate claims (ie not baseless/unsupported).
I thank the original commenter for pointing out this. I was going to point this out myself if he/she had not done so.
If you were taken the time to understand the structure of the article you would see that the two times KDE was praised were on the two paragraphs that detailed the DEFICIENCIES of Gnome. Praising KDE at these two times DOES NOT MEAN that on all the rest of points KDE prevails or not. KDE is mentioned there to simply help make the case for these two gnome problems. This article is not a full comparison of the two DEs. But having used both, as a normal user, I still prefer Gnome over any other X11 DE. You are free to disagree and submit a comparison review.
Don't get me wrong. I was simply agreeing with ralph. And you are welcome to disagree with both of us. We're simply the readers. What do we know?
"If you were taken the time to understand the structure of the article"
I read it over a few times to try to understand your summary paragraph. I couldn't. Maybe I am dumb.