Members of the Linux community have complained that the hot new sub-notebook from Asus, the eeePC, may have violated the spirit of the Linux General Public License. Some Linux advocates claim the eeePC has not included required source code with the installed Xandros Linux distribution and does not easily enable users to install another distro. However, there are indications that eeePC fans probably don't care.
To read all comments associated with this story, please click here.
Member since:2005-07-08
Yeah, this is simply Asus being incompetent. They included a printed copy of the GPL in the manual and even cited the GPL somewhere on the retail box. They posted a source tarball on their website, but it doesn't contain the sources for all of the packages on the eeePC. Maybe the tarball was reused from some other Linux-based product that Asus distributes.
It's quite possible that getting the proper source code on their website got bungled in their rush to get the machine out it time for the holidays. It's hard to imagine that Asus would jeopardize a product for which they have very high hopes by distributing modifications to GPL software for which they won't or can't provide the corresponding source. I'd be very surprised if they don't comply and avoid a lawsuit.
As Warren Woodford from MEPIS learned the hard way, the GPL requires the distributor to provide all corresponding source--at least upon request and payment of a reasonable fee--even for packages redistributed unmodified from an upstream distributor. So Asus is obligated under the GPL to provide source for GPLed Xandros packages it distributes unmodified.
However, Asus is not required to provide source for its modified madwifi ath_pci driver, since that is dual-licensed under GPL/BSD. As it seems that the version from madwifi's SVN currently lacks support for the eeePC's wireless chipset, it may be that the only solution for those who want to install a different Linux distribution is the binary from Asus.
I'm definitely giving Asus the benefit of the doubt and waiting for some official response. In the computer industry, if a sensational story is Slashdotted, Dugg, and OSNewsed, the company has no choice but to respond. The eeePC is a Good Thing(TM) for Linux, and Asus has done some other interesting Linux work like their SplashTop BIOS that runs Firefox and Skype. As OEMs go, Asus is among the more Linux-friendly, and I'm expecting an amicable resolution to this story.
Edited 2007-11-26 01:50
Member since:2006-01-03
Member since:2006-01-26
Yeah, this is simply Asus being incompetent.
...
It's quite possible that getting the proper source code on their website got bungled in their rush to get the machine out it time for the holidays.
As an ASUS customer for many years, I can attest that their support and website quality has degraded a lot since I first started purchasing their products in the mid-90s.
These days, finding stuff on their website is painful, or simply impossible. I have found newer BIOS updates, manuals, and drivers for their motherboards in places other than their downloads section. That is ridiculous. Sometimes you have to go to their non-US website to find the right stuff. Clearly they don't put enough effort into their website and support any longer.
Member since:
2005-07-01
The ASUS EeePC has been a great triumph for Linux. OK, so one of the drivers hasn't had it's source released. Before the community starts burning piles of EeePCs, could someone try asking nicely and see if that works? If, a couple of months down the line, it looks like they aren't going to play, then maybe it's time to talk to a lawyer. Until then, I think ASUS are still with the good guys.