OSNews > Thread > "RE[4]: haha" by google

Asus Releases Source Code to GPL eeePC Software Components

Linked by Thom Holwerda on Tue 27th Nov 2007 21:12 UTC, submitted by Anonymous Coward

Asus has responded to the GPL violation allegations. "The source code found here is complete to the best of Asus's knowledge. If you believe any additional source code files should be provided under the applicable open source license, please contact Asus at support@asus.com and provide in detail the product or code module in question. Asus is committed to meeting the requirements of the open source licenses including the GNU General Public License." Additionally, ASUS announced the upcoming SDK for the eeePC. "Asus is also pleased to announce the upcoming release of the Eee PC SDK. This will allow for the development on the Eee PC by the OpenSource community making it easy to develop, easy to port and easy to release software for the Eee PC platform."

1 71 Comment(s)

http://osne.ws/en5

Thread beginning with comment 287380
To view parent comment, click here.
To read all comments associated with this story, please click here.

RE[4]: haha

by google_ninja on Wed 28th Nov 2007 17:14 UTC in reply to "RE[3]: haha"

Member since:
2006-02-05

Its been awhile since I've seen you post around here Moulinneuf, I'm sure everyone has missed thoughtful and insightful dialog like

"Your a **BSD** , you have no credibility at all"

"2) **You** are fast at burning someone. Other's like me just reply in kind , to your intelligence lacking insulting and unrealistic and fabricated reality that is completely unrealistic."

"3) Your a liar , traitor , coward and incompetent. "

"I apparently , also need to actually point to you and take you by your childish hands , that Opening and freeing the source code will enable BSD and other OS to be run properly and correctly on this device and the hardware it's made of."

In a single post, you managed to break rules 1-4 and rule 6 of the OSNews forum rules (http://www4.osnews.com/docs/rules). I have to admit, I do love reading your posts though, especially the wild, barely comprehensible meltdowns about BSD.

Edited 2007-11-28 17:17 UTC

Reply Parent Bookmark Score: 2

RE[5]: haha

by Moulinneuf on Wed 28th Nov 2007 17:37 in reply to "RE[4]: haha"

"Its been awhile since I've seen you post around here Moulinneuf,"

http://www.osnews.com/user.php?uid=266

Follow the above link since you don't know how to use the website ... I actually read all the time and Post when I have the time and feel like it ...

"you managed to break rules 1-4 and rule 6 of the OSNews"

"I. No gratuitous use of profanity, biting sarcasm, or personal disparagement, especially directed at individuals."

Not broken here ...

"II. No personal attacks on story authors, other readers, or news editors of this web site."

Not broken here ...

"III. Even if you are in violent disagreement or have strong feelings, find a way to keep your comments calm, and try to explain your reasoning, instead of just ranting."

Not Broken here ...

IV. OSNews is not just an open source news web site, and it is not just an "alternative" OS site. Do not post comments that merely disparage a particular OS or company. Some examples of sentiments that are in violation of this rule: "MS Sucks!", "Apple is dead!", "People who use KDE should be shot!", etc. If you hate Microsoft, or Apple, or Linux, or whatever, you may still talk about your hatred on OSNews, but please do so with reasoned, on-topic arguments.
VI. This is the most subjective of the rules, but its enforcement is important to everyone's enjoyment: no mindless OS wars. In other words, please constrain your zeal for your particular pet OS, company, or product. Regardless of your intention, comments that we deem to be likely to ignite a flame war will be moderated down. Even including a throwaway "X rules, Y sucks" line into your reasoned masterpiece may result in the whole post being moderated down by the community or by the OSNews editors (see XII).

Not broken here ...

"I do love reading your posts though"

Thanks ... ( I know your dishonest here ;-) )

"especially the wild, barely comprehensible meltdowns about BSD. "

If I was truly wild , incomprehensible and on a meltdown.

1) You would not bother.
2) You would not care to try and have me banned.
3) You would actually directly answer what I discussed.

Nice opinion about me do.

Reply Parent Bookmark Score: -2