Linked by Thom Holwerda on Tue 27th Nov 2007 21:12 UTC, submitted by Anonymous Coward
Thread beginning with comment 287396
To view parent comment, click here.
To read all comments associated with this story, please click here.
To view parent comment, click here.
To read all comments associated with this story, please click here.
heh, Openoffice on a 900mhz machine is a lot slower than office on the same machine.
Slower to start, maybe. Slower in use? I doubt it. I don't see any significant speed difference on my old 900MHz Athlon desktop.
I do agree that people will use what they will want to use. On the other hand, the Linux eeePC is a great way to get acquainted with something that, though different, is just as capable for a vast majority of users. It seems, however, that some people here (not you) are incapable of considering that people might function just as well with a Linux OS than one from Redmond...







Member since:
2005-07-06
heh, Openoffice on a 900mhz machine is a lot slower than office on the same machine. (my work pc is a 1ghz pentium 3 and I have office 2003 installed and had the latest revision of openoffice on here until a few days ago).

Anyways, this whole argument is really pointless. people are going to use what they like best and/or is best for their needs. I didn't mean to start a windows vs linux war...
jeez, I post a joke and a typical conversation springs up