To view parent comment, click here.
To read all comments associated with this story, please click here.
Actually, kwin's compositor is so bad it's unusable.. Xfwm4's is awesome, it almost works. But kwin's is just baaaad (or at least the 3.4.0 one was).
I think it was a direct fork of the now dead xcompmgr. Thats why I plan to move to KDE in 3.5, when some of the bugs are worked out.
Gnome is right to not include one; it'd just be a lot of extra list traffic like this:
Well, if Gnome wants Metacity to continue to be a blight on the entire DE then I will not stand in their way. But I will say that an accerated desktop is about more than eye candy, and no Window Manager in existance needs compositing more than Metacity (its the only thing that makes the draw black crap all over your screen when minimizing "feature" tolerable).
Metacity has two compositing related branches. One is luminacity which is a testbed for all kind of OpenGL effects and the other is spiffifity, which is about improving the built in compositing manager. It will be available once it's ready and everything is stable.
If you are looking for experimental eye candy, your best choice probably would be E17 anyway. 





Member since:
2005-06-29
Actually, kwin's compositor is so bad it's unusable.. Xfwm4's is awesome, it almost works. But kwin's is just baaaad (or at least the 3.4.0 one was).
Also, xapp's will composite anything. Gnome is right to not include one; it'd just be a lot of extra list traffic like this:
"my compositor doesn't work"
"unsupported, shutup."
"are you gonna fix it?"
"unsupported, shutup."
"why do you tell me to shutup?"
"rtfm"
"but it's in there, so isn't it supported?"
"NO, leave us alone already!"