Linked by Thom Holwerda on Sun 25th Nov 2007 11:12 UTC, submitted by trinitrotolueen
Mac OS X "This is something I never thought I'd hear myself say - or maybe I should say, see myself type - about an Apple operating system: Mac OSX Leopard was released before it was ready. This operating system needed more testing on more systems with more hardware, and especially, more software configurations. The days of Apple computers operating with just the Mac OS and Adobe Photoshop installed, and practically nothing else to speak of, are long gone, and Apple knows this as well as anyone. This operating system was not properly beta tested, and Apple's customers are paying for it, with lost productivity and inoperative computers."
Thread beginning with comment 287644
To read all comments associated with this story, please click here.
Leopard as 'bad' as Vista?
by MollyC on Fri 30th Nov 2007 05:20 UTC
MollyC
Member since:
2006-07-04

More Leopard complaints, even going so far as to compare Leopard's bugginess with Vista's! (The horror!!) :p

Leopard is the New Vista, and It's Pissing Me Off
http://www.pcmag.com/article2/0,2704,2223921,00.asp

But the fact is, no software as complex as a modern OS is "perfect", and none is even significantly less buggy than any other, IMO (crap drivers notwithstanding). I still don't trust either Vista or Leopard enough to upgrade to them. In fact, I don't plan to upgrade to either until I get a new Mac (which may be soon, since I don't think Apple will support PPC Macs for much longer) and Windows computer.

Edited 2007-11-30 05:30