Linked by Thom Holwerda on Tue 4th Dec 2007 10:23 UTC, submitted by Francis Kuntz
Mac OS X "No one is unhappy with Mac OS X Version 10.4, known as Tiger. OS X is not an application platform that needed repair, speeding up, or exterior renovation. Motivations for major upgrades of competing system software - roll-ups of an unmanageable number of fixes, because the calendar says it's time, or because users are perceived to have version fatigue - don't apply to OS X. People buy Macs because the platform as a whole is perfect, full stop. Leopard is a rung above perfection. It's taken as rote that the Mac blows away PC users' expectations. Leopard blows away Mac users' expectations, and that's saying a great deal."
Thread beginning with comment 288348
To view parent comment, click here.
To read all comments associated with this story, please click here.
RE[7]: Hmmm
by TomB7 on Tue 4th Dec 2007 17:30 UTC in reply to "RE[6]: Hmmm"
TomB7
Member since:
2006-01-03

"Many do have legacy WIN 32 and DOS apps that they must continue to use. "


It would be interesting to have the Enterprise IT folk who may visit this forum comment. It's hard to imagine Users all across America being forced to run Windows so the CFO can run his 1980 version of Visicalc.

Reply Parent Score: 1

RE[8]: Hmmm
by dylansmrjones on Tue 4th Dec 2007 23:57 in reply to "RE[7]: Hmmm"
dylansmrjones Member since:
2005-10-02

Don't think visicalc. Think database systems.

Reply Parent Score: 3

RE[8]: Hmmm
by TLZ_ on Wed 5th Dec 2007 20:30 in reply to "RE[7]: Hmmm"
TLZ_ Member since:
2007-02-05

You'd be suprised about how many old systems people are running around places. In the gov. sector here in Norway I've used to seee DOS-apps all the time 4-6 years ago, now I see it's being replaced. Haven't seen those in a time, but I see Win9X stuff all the time.

And yes: think custom-made DB systems.

Reply Parent Score: 1