To read all comments associated with this story, please click here.
"If Linux wants to be taken seriously in the entrenched market, then they need to get WINE fully compatible with Windows XP, to the point where Novell and Red Hat will start certifying Windows applications for it. They can shirk Vista for a while. This lull in adoption will give them a chance to catch up. "
Why wine, even Linux and Eric don't agree with that assesment. Wine at best allows you to use legacy applications. It would be better to focus on recreating necessary *functionality* that a windows applications possibly have; open formats allowing none lock in...or you get the gist.
In fact in interests where binary *anything* has been an option these are the areas where GNU is at its weakest.
Because there are so many Windows applications that don't have an OpenSource alternative (or an closed source alternative that runs on Linux). I'd love to completely ditch Windows and use Ubuntu exclusively but there are so many Apps that i use which require Windows or Mac.
I don't believe Wine is going to resolve this issue though. Apart from really trivial Programs nothing i ever tried worked on Wine... not even those Apps from the AppDB Platinum list.
If there only at least was a parallels equivalent on Linux (Hardware accelerated 3d+good integration).




Member since:
2006-01-06
If Linux wants to be taken seriously in the entrenched market, then they need to get WINE fully compatible with Windows XP, to the point where Novell and Red Hat will start certifying Windows applications for it. They can shirk Vista for a while. This lull in adoption will give them a chance to catch up.
But there's really no reason why IT markets in developing nations would particularly want to choose Windows XP or Vista over say, Ubuntu. I guess that's where the bribes come in.
Edited 2007-12-04 20:57