Linked by Thom Holwerda on Thu 6th Dec 2007 16:27 UTC
Mac OS X Since my Cube could not run Leopard, and I did not have any other Macs, I was unable to delve into Leopard right away. Apple NL was kind enough to fix this problem for us, by generously loaning me a brand new MacBook with Leopard installed so I could review it for OSNews. Read on for the findings.
Thread beginning with comment 289151
To view parent comment, click here.
To read all comments associated with this story, please click here.
RE[3]: Stationary
by abraxas on Fri 7th Dec 2007 04:31 UTC in reply to "RE[2]: Stationary"
abraxas
Member since:
2005-07-07

HTML mail CAN do more than plaintext. Don't be willfully ignorant. You can format what you say, you can add images, and overall make an easier to read document.

If you want to send a document why not send an attachment?

Just because you can't control everything people send you anymore doesn't mean HTML mail is a bad thing, it means you have control issues.

This has nothing to do with control. I can block all HTML email messages if I want to. The problem is that it adds absolutely no benefit at all. If you need a structured document there are better options than HTML in an email.

This topic is going down the tubes. And I honestly feel the unreasonable ones are the people who have such a strong irrational hatred of something that could be useful to other people.

I wouldn't say useful but rather over used. How often do you save documents as HTML? I don't see it being the document type of choice for anyone so why try to use it for something it was never designed for when there are better options?

Reply Parent Score: 3

RE[4]: Stationary
by Soulbender on Fri 7th Dec 2007 05:07 in reply to "RE[3]: Stationary"
Soulbender Member since:
2005-08-18

If you want to send a document why not send an attachment?


You do realize that using attachments "wastes" even more bandwidth than HTML mail?

Reply Parent Score: 2

RE[5]: Stationary
by djst on Sat 8th Dec 2007 11:16 in reply to "RE[3]: Stationary"
djst Member since:
2005-08-07

If you want to send a document why not send an attachment?

You mean resorting to leave your mail client and use a separate application to read an e-mail?

You mean telling your recipient "Hey, I've sent you an email, but don't read here, click on the attachment, because I added emphasis on a few words to aid readability."?

You mean making the e-mail at least five times larger because of a) the attachment itself and b) the way attachments are encoded in an e-mail?

I hope my rhetorical questions answer your question.

Reply Parent Score: 2