Linked by Thom Holwerda on Thu 6th Dec 2007 16:27 UTC
Thread beginning with comment 289547
To view parent comment, click here.
To read all comments associated with this story, please click here.
To view parent comment, click here.
To read all comments associated with this story, please click here.
I think it's hilarious that your case against HTML formatting uses both italics and bold text. Thanks for proving yourself wrong. Saves a lot of time for the rest of us.
I didn't make against against HTML formatting, just its use in e-mail.
(FWIW, I make my living as a web developer, so making against HTML as a whole would be somewhat ridiculous).
I didn't make against against HTML formatting, just its use in e-mail.
(FWIW, I make my living as a web developer, so making against HTML as a whole would be somewhat ridiculous).
How is e-mail different from any other form of written communication? Why, in your opinion, should it be allowed to use formatting on web pages, in printed magazines, newspapers, books, postcards, letters -- but not in e-mails?
Your case is somewhat ridiculous.





Member since:
2005-08-07
"When people tell me HTML email is evil, I always press them to tell me why."

I'll tell you why: because it's obnoxious and rude.
I want to read e-mail in the format and style that's most comfortable to me; anything else and you're immediately hindering any chances of me dealing with your message in an efficient fashion.
I think it's hilarious that your case against HTML formatting uses both italics and bold text. Thanks for proving yourself wrong. Saves a lot of time for the rest of us.