Linked by Eugenia Loli-Queru on Mon 10th Dec 2007 07:49 UTC
Thread beginning with comment 289871
To read all comments associated with this story, please click here.
To read all comments associated with this story, please click here.
RE: Comment by Thom_Holwerda
by cheezlbub on Mon 10th Dec 2007 17:00
in reply to "Comment by Thom_Holwerda"
Touchscreen sucks balls. Whether they call it "multitouch" or not. I can't operate this thing blindly, and hence, it is of no use to me.
A music player that you need to look at to operate is useless. For me, that is.
A music player that you need to look at to operate is useless. For me, that is.
agreed - horrible ipod.
fantastic PDA for apple people though (once you jailbreak it)
RE: Comment by Thom_Holwerda
by Phil on Mon 10th Dec 2007 20:04
in reply to "Comment by Thom_Holwerda"
Not totally sure why I'm posting a me-too comment, but I feel like doing it.
I have a very old fashioned iRiver H120 (or rather iHP when I bought it) that has loads of buttons on it. There aren't that many occasions that I choose function over form, but iPod touch just seems rididulously impractical.
With all my buttons/joysticks I can change track, volume etc without taking the thing out of my pocket. I always have the pause button physically available if I want to quickly stop something (invaluable when using for learning.)
Plus with RockBox I can play asteroids on it with the joystick - and what could be better than that?






Member since:
2005-06-29
Touchscreen sucks balls. Whether they call it "multitouch" or not. I can't operate this thing blindly, and hence, it is of no use to me.
A music player that you need to look at to operate is useless. For me, that is.