Linked by Eugenia Loli-Queru on Mon 10th Dec 2007 07:49 UTC
Thread beginning with comment 289962
To read all comments associated with this story, please click here.
To read all comments associated with this story, please click here.
RE: Now this I would buy
by Chicken Blood on Tue 11th Dec 2007 17:34
in reply to "Now this I would buy"
was waiting for. I could care less about video and web surfing, the thought of trying to watch a movie on a 2" screen while squinting for two hours isn't all that appealing.
The screen is 3.5". Also there is no 'squinting' involved. You just hold it at a comfortable distance from the face and it's no different to watching a bigger screen farther away. What is important is the angle subtended at the eye and the resolution, not the size of the screen (there are limits to this, of course).
Edited 2007-12-11 17:35 UTC
RE[2]: Now this I would buy
by Phloptical on Thu 13th Dec 2007 00:49
in reply to "RE: Now this I would buy"






Member since:
2006-10-10
Forget the overpriced iPhone....THIS is the device I was waiting for. I could care less about video and web surfing, the thought of trying to watch a movie on a 2" screen while squinting for two hours isn't all that appealing. All I want is an excellent sounding, easy to manage/use ipod for music to replace my 3G ipod. I know there are other manufacturer's devices for cheaper, but let's be honest. The iPod is king, everyone else is an imitator. Why settle for less?
I do have one question. It would seem that this is entirely flash based. If that's the case, then, I should probably wait until at least a 20GB version gets released to buy one.