Linked by Eugenia Loli on Wed 12th Dec 2007 05:56 UTC
Benchmarks A lot was said lately about the Vorbis/Theora vs h.264/AAC situation on the draft of the HTML5. As some of you know, video is my main hobby these days (I care not about operating systems anymore), so I have gain some experience on the field lately, and at the same time this has made me more demanding about video quality. Read on for a head to head test: OGG Theora/Vorbis vs MP4 h.264/AAC. Yup, with videos. And pictures.
Thread beginning with comment 290192
To view parent comment, click here.
To read all comments associated with this story, please click here.
RE[7]: Video Quality
by Eugenia on Wed 12th Dec 2007 11:19 UTC in reply to "RE[6]: Video Quality"
Eugenia
Member since:
2005-06-28

Yes, to me, this is quite some difference, and I am sure that content providers would agree. For example, if youtube was to use theora, and would have bleed an average of 200 KBs per video in order to achieve the same quality as if they were to use h.264 at a lower bitrate, this is a lot of money per day.

And since youtube is the No1 video provider right now, I am pretty sure they would care about this...

I don't see people moving en mass away from youtube btw.

ok, I am off to sleep, it's 3:22 AM here.

Edited 2007-12-12 11:20

Reply Parent Score: 1

RE[8]: Video Quality
by hobgoblin on Wed 12th Dec 2007 11:22 in reply to "RE[7]: Video Quality"
hobgoblin Member since:
2005-07-06

i would hazard the guess that if youtube was so interested in quality pr bits, they would not have gone for flash in the first place...

Reply Parent Score: 5

RE[9]: Video Quality
by Eugenia on Wed 12th Dec 2007 11:23 in reply to "RE[8]: Video Quality"
Eugenia Member since:
2005-06-28

They had no alternative. Flash has market penetration. Ok, off to sleep now. This has become silly.

Reply Parent Score: 0