To read all comments associated with this story, please click here.
"I haven't taken a look at Enlightenment in *many years* - but I well remember Enlightenment from 10+ years ago. And it was pretty much the butt of every joke regarding window manager performance. "
You should probably check it out again, because now it runs circles around KDE or GNOME, and possibly around XFCE too.
Things have changed quite a bit since then. Back then, E was the "bling" desktop, it was a lot flashier then the alternatives, but also rather resource heavy. The thing is, the rest of the linux GUI world has pretty much caught up, but are a good 5 years behind rasterman (the lead dev) when it comes to ideas and techniques. His rendering libraries are probably the most efficient out of whats available atm.
The only thing is that OpenMoko recently hired him, I have no idea what kind of impact that will have on E.
I'll have to check it out again one of these days in the not too distant future. I settled comfortably in to OpenBox a few years ago and haven't had much motivation to explore other WM's and Desktop Managers since.




Member since:
2005-07-06
From the article: "Enlightenment has a solid reputation as a lighter desktop..."
I haven't taken a look at Enlightenment in *many years* - but I well remember Enlightenment from 10+ years ago. And it was pretty much the butt of every joke regarding window manager performance.
Window Maker (which was WindowMaker [without the space] 10+ years ago) was my *light* WM of choice back then. I remember toying around with all kinds of window managers back then but all I ever heard about Enlightenment was what a bloated pile of code it was. I remember the reflective water effect at the bottom of the screen, translucent window movement, etc... back on my Pentium 166!
I remember RedHat (I think version 6.something) shipped with Enlightenment/Gnome as the default Desktop. (http://www.linuxjournal.com/article/3590) What a hideous mess that was.
Edited for typo.
Edited 2007-12-14 03:05