Linked by Eugenia Loli-Queru on Sun 16th Dec 2007 00:02 UTC
Thread beginning with comment 291640
To view parent comment, click here.
To read all comments associated with this story, please click here.
To view parent comment, click here.
To read all comments associated with this story, please click here.
RE[3]: Article is misleading
by trenchsol on Tue 18th Dec 2007 13:37
in reply to "RE[2]: Article is misleading "
Linux vendors live, die and work in capitalistic environment. They need to follow the rules in order to survive and make money.
Xandros is "bad", Linspire is "bad". Novell is "bad". RedHat is "good" now, but they have been "bad" couple of years ago.
Debian was always "good", but they don't make money at all.
There is no "good" or "bad", all of them are trying to make living. And all of them are offering, at least, one variant of their distribution for free.






Member since:
2005-07-22
Ah, "anti-capitalistic". Like capitalism is an unblemished virtue. Just say left-leaning/communist, why don't you.