Linked by Thom Holwerda on Sun 23rd Dec 2007 17:41 UTC, submitted by koki
Thread beginning with comment 292936
To view parent comment, click here.
To read all comments associated with this story, please click here.
To view parent comment, click here.
To read all comments associated with this story, please click here.
RE[3]: haiku dev seems pointless
by smitty on Sun 23rd Dec 2007 23:01
in reply to "RE[2]: haiku dev seems pointless"
Webkit is quite portable, for a browser. You can emphasize the first part of that sentence, or the last. Still, it's not exactly news that it's more difficult to port programs to Haiku, because the OS's API is fairly different from most others. That's really what makes Haiku interesting, though.
RE[4]: haiku dev seems pointless
by mckill on Mon 24th Dec 2007 01:46
in reply to "RE[3]: haiku dev seems pointless"





Member since:
2005-07-06
There's a useful distinction that the Be Inc. engineers used to make regarding portability: there's a difference between software that is portable and software that has been ported.