To read all comments associated with this story, please click here.
On the contrary, I think as the Mac is getting more and more popular, and more developers make Mac-only apps (there's already a ton), some may wish to port these to other platforms, without a complete rewrite.
GNUStep may be the solution to their needs (depending on the coverage of the Mac OS X APIs).
Edited 2007-12-25 01:49
The read advantage for everyone is that developers can develop in the comfort of a Unix environment like Mac or Linux, then spend a little bit of time tweaking the program and create a windows version instead of the other way around. Your Mac apps look and behaves native, and there is really no such thing as a Windows native feel (just look at the differences even amongst all the MS apps).
The sad fact is that a large number of people are forced to use windows for one reason or another, and with GNUStep, you can still use Objective-C and Windows users can use your programs.







Member since:
2006-01-08
Honestly, who's going to use it on Windows of all platforms? GNUStep doesn't have killer apps to entice Windows users, and apps appear even more alien in Windows than any Gtk+ app ever did. Even on its native Linux environment as a developer toolkit it's far overshadowed in mindshare by Gtk+/Gnome and Qt/KDE. As a cross platform compatibility layer for OS X Cocoa apps it lags too far behind the Apple libraries and does not seem to be catching up.
The project really seems to be headed for a dead end (or a vanishing niche) to me, regardless of coolness or technical merits. This may sound like flamebait, but I think it's just a realistic assessment of the market. (Yes, even FOSS projects have markets. Even if they don't get money, they still need active users and developers to stay alive.)