Linked by Thom Holwerda on Thu 3rd Jan 2008 22:37 UTC
Thread beginning with comment 294192
To view parent comment, click here.
To read all comments associated with this story, please click here.
To view parent comment, click here.
To read all comments associated with this story, please click here.
Except the bezel isn't really that thin. It looks really thin in the first shot, but is of normal non-OMG thickness in the second. There are other differences too. The camera is in the glass in the first, but in the (thicker) bezel in the second. Speakers' front is silver in the first, black in the second.
So which represents the actual product? If Dell's page* is to be believed, the product is represented by the second shot. The one with the regular thick old bezel. So I wouldn't even be interested *without* the glass
* http://www.dell.com/content/topics/topic.aspx/global/products/monit...






Member since:
2005-07-07
Seriously, if that monitor didn't have the glass in front and were built by NEC or Eizo, I'd be all over it. That has to be the thinnest bezel I've ever seen by far, and they ruin it with that huge piece of glass. Talk about gimmicky trash.