Linked by Thom Holwerda on Sat 10th Sep 2005 19:26 UTC
"We consider Mono 1.1.9 stable enough to recommend it for all users. Those upgrading from the 1.0.x series should note that these notes only contain the differences between 1.1.8 and 1.1.9."
Thread beginning with comment 29422
To read all comments associated with this story, please click here.
To read all comments associated with this story, please click here.
Member since:So if patents affect .NET, how come no-one ever mentions Java patents?
Because some people are rabidly anti-MS and will do anything to stop the spread of .NET. So they spread FUD, and the situation isn't helped by some of the comments MS execs have made about FOSS in the past, even if they haven't ever sued anyone.
Recent Original Stories
Recent Comments
Headlines
Random Comments
Random Stories
Random OS Link
Member since:
2005-07-06
So if patents affect .NET, how come no-one ever mentions Java patents?
http://www.theregister.co.uk/2004/10/04/kodak_wins_java/
http://arstechnica.com/news.ars/post/20041007-4284.html
If Sun were infringing Kodak's patents when they implemented Java, presumably anyone else who implements it is, too...and Kodak, unlike Microsoft, sued someone already. Did anyone license Kodak's patents for free Java yet?