Linked by Thom Holwerda on Mon 7th Jan 2008 19:20 UTC, submitted by mariuz
Thread beginning with comment 294882
To read all comments associated with this story, please click here.
To read all comments associated with this story, please click here.
Agreed, and another thing: some of us don't have a choice in the matter. I work with hundreds (seriously!) of Sun boxes on a daily basis, and vi is what we have. Not even Vim (bummer), and definitely no Emacs.
For me, and lots of others, you learn to use the editor you have access to. I can always apply my mad Vim skillz to vi (well, some of them) and vice-versa. Emacs doesn't even fit into the equation.






Member since:
2007-07-27
Unix philosophy is having smaller well defined programs doing one thing well, interact. VI/Vim is small and have a beatiful and elegant editing model.
Emacs is large and monolithic. An operating system with an editor attached to it. It fits more into the paradigm of Microsoft; that of large monolithic programs that can do everything.
Hence, VI/Vim > emacs. ;o)