Linked by Thom Holwerda on Tue 8th Jan 2008 22:28 UTC, submitted by BSDfan
Thread beginning with comment 295014
To read all comments associated with this story, please click here.
To read all comments associated with this story, please click here.
RE: Good move for Unix, bad move for 4Front.
by binarycrusader on Wed 9th Jan 2008 01:22
in reply to "Good move for Unix, bad move for 4Front."
The GPL and CDDL rather limited the comercial, proprietary use that could be made of OSS by parties outside 4Front. Now with a release under the BSD license, 4Front have esentially given away the ability to use OSS in closed-source products, while not getting anything for it. In one fell swoop, then just did away with their business.
The GPL did, the CDDL did not (not from any practical standpoint).
RE: Good move for Unix, bad move for 4Front.
by Soulbender on Wed 9th Jan 2008 03:42
in reply to "Good move for Unix, bad move for 4Front."
In one fell swoop, then just did away with their business.
Yes, I'm sure they didn't in any way at all investigate the different options and instead let some random engineer make the decision.
And how could they have forgotten to consult the business model experts at the OSNews forums?
RE: Good move for Unix, bad move for 4Front.
by vegai on Wed 9th Jan 2008 13:01
in reply to "Good move for Unix, bad move for 4Front."
Read here.
http://www.4front-tech.com/hannublog/
It seems that they killed their revenue by going to GPL/CDDL. So BSD shouldn't hurt more.
RE[2]: Good move for Unix, bad move for 4Front.
by Flatland_Spider on Wed 9th Jan 2008 15:39
in reply to "RE: Good move for Unix, bad move for 4Front."






Member since:
2006-03-13
The GPL and CDDL rather limited the comercial, proprietary use that could be made of OSS by parties outside 4Front. Now with a release under the BSD license, 4Front have esentially given away the ability to use OSS in closed-source products, while not getting anything for it. In one fell swoop, then just did away with their business.