To view parent comment, click here.
To read all comments associated with this story, please click here.
It's quite simple. If the facet of KDE X.0 under discussion makes KDE X look good, then KDE X.0 is KDE X. And if the facet of KDE X.0 under discussion does not make KDE X look good, then KDE X.0 is not KDE X.
Does that clear things up? ;-)
Edited 2008-01-12 10:38 UTC
> KDE 3.0, released April 3 2002, was not KDE 3.
> Every release of KDE with the major version number = 3 (that is, every release that matches the pattern KDE 3.*.*) is a KDE 3 release.
So KDE 3.0 is not KDE 3. But KDE 3.0 is KDE 3. Do you actually believe this, or are you getting tongue-tied?
I'm not getting tongue tied, and I said nothing of the sort.
It works like this:
- KDE 3.0 is part of the KDE 3 series or releases, the first one (release) of the series in fact.
- The KDE 3 series of releases is most often referred to as simply "KDE 3".
- Typically, when one says "KDE 3" one means the whole series, not just the one release KDE 3.0.0 (or for that matter any other release KDE 3.something.something).
- Ergo, KDE 3.0.0 is not KDE 3. KDE 3.0.0 is just one release within KDE 3.
- Likewise for KDE 4.0.0. Although KDE 4.0.0 happens right now to be the only release in the KDE 4 series, that won't remain true even for the whole of just this year.
- Ergo, KDE 4.0.0 is not KDE 4.
Follow?
It doesn't matter if you do, or don't follow, it is perfectly clear to people of adequate intelligence.
The term "Windows XP" does not refer exclusively to just any one of these products:
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Windows_xp#Editions
... nor does it refer exclusively to any particular one of these releases:
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Windows_xp#Service_packs
Rather the term "Windows XP" refers to the whole set:
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Windows_xp
Just as the term "Windows XP" refers to a whole series of operating system releases, so to does the term "KDE 3" refer to a series of desktop releases. The term "KDE 4" refers to a newer series of the same line, just as the term "Windows Vista" refers to a newer series of a line of operating system releases from Microsoft.
- KDE 3.0 is part of the KDE 3 series or releases, the first one (release) of the series in fact.
- The KDE 3 series of releases is most often referred to as simply "KDE 3".
- Typically, when one says "KDE 3" one means the whole series, not just the one release KDE 3.0.0 (or for that matter any other release KDE 3.something.something).
- Ergo, KDE 3.0.0 is not KDE 3. KDE 3.0.0 is just one release within KDE 3.
Man, I've taken some propositional logic courses in my life time, and you just failed them. You are definitely in a crazy minority on this.
It works like this:
- KDE 3.0 is part of the KDE 3 series or releases, the first one (release) of the series in fact.
- The KDE 3 series of releases is most often referred to as simply "KDE 3".
- Typically, when one says "KDE 3" one means the whole series, not just the one release KDE 3.0.0 (or for that matter any other release KDE 3.something.something).
- Ergo, KDE 3.0.0 is not KDE 3. KDE 3.0.0 is just one release within KDE 3.
KDE 3.0.0 is not WHOLE KDE 3, but it is one release within KDE 3 and as such it can be referred to as "KDE 3". KDE 3.0 is as much KDE3 as KDE 3.5 is KDE3. Ergo, KDE 4.0 is as much KDE4 as KDE 4.1. Either you call them all KDE4 or you call none of them KDE4.
As for trying to use Windows XP as an example..well, you call Windows XP without any SP applied Windows XP anyway, don't you? So KDE4.0 is KDE4 too.






Member since:
2007-03-30
You just said that KDE 3 is KDE 3 and KDE 3 is not KDE 3.
> KDE 3.0, released April 3 2002, was not KDE 3.
> Every release of KDE with the major version number = 3 (that is, every release that matches the pattern KDE 3.*.*) is a KDE 3 release.
So KDE 3.0 is not KDE 3. But KDE 3.0 is KDE 3. Do you actually believe this, or are you getting tongue-tied?