Linked by Thom Holwerda on Sun 13th Jan 2008 20:09 UTC
Thread beginning with comment 295676
To view parent comment, click here.
To read all comments associated with this story, please click here.
To view parent comment, click here.
To read all comments associated with this story, please click here.
The menu style and transitions are a matter of taste, not science.
Well, partly. The style may be partly taste, but the value of fluid transitions has been quite extensively studied. A transition done right is always easier to understand than a sudden change (which can induce change blindness).
Well, partly. The style may be partly taste, but the value of fluid transitions has been quite extensively studied. A transition done right is always easier to understand than a sudden change (which can induce change blindness).
It's not the transition I have issues with, it's the sliding concept in itself. I have a 22" 1680x1050 screen, why the need to cram all the menus into one tiny sliding box? It hides the menu path from view, and makes it unnecessarily complex to travel backwards.
Edited 2008-01-13 22:13 UTC
Well, what bothered me about the new menu is how some things you can just roll over (the five tabs at the bottom) while some things you have to click on (the 'back' button, the scrollbar).
You can disable the activate-on-mouseover thing somewhere, but since my Ubuntu machine is powered down, I can't check exactly where it was. Probably right-click the Kickoff button.
Spatial browsing was also found to be more efficient yet met with much resistance when Gnome introduced it as you may recall.
...and it never really became popular. Ubuntu at least has made the good old browser mode default and not without a reason. Actually, I forced myself for some time to use spatial mode as everyone hyped it as the next big thing being sooo much more usable. However I never really felt comfortable with windows that offer not even an address bar, so when I saw that Ubuntu defaulted to browsing mode it came as a relief.
Quite possible the new menu replacement may suffer a similar fate, being ignored or replaced by distributors.
am I the only one, or is the original kickoff in OpenSuSE 10.3 really so much more usable than the derivate found in KDE 4? Actually, when testing OpenSUSE I was surprised to find that I actually liked SuSE's kickoff, basically because how it integrates the type ahead search.





Member since:
2005-07-06
The menu IS fixed size, though the size is configurable. For people who have gotten used to a menu that expands to fit the contents the use of a scrollbar is awkward. Perhaps studies have shown it to be better, but it makes it inconsistent with all previous experience for users and with application menus.
The menu style and transitions are a matter of taste, not science. Studies may have shown that this menu is better. I will not argue the veracity of the conclusions in either direction. The fact is that for many the new menu is far from an optimal user experience. Spatial browsing was also found to be more efficient yet met with much resistance when Gnome introduced it as you may recall.