Linked by Thom Holwerda on Sun 13th Jan 2008 20:09 UTC
Thread beginning with comment 295677
To view parent comment, click here.
To read all comments associated with this story, please click here.
To view parent comment, click here.
To read all comments associated with this story, please click here.
RE[2]: Intentional farce?
by superstoned on Mon 14th Jan 2008 12:56
in reply to "RE: Intentional farce?"
It's not just a few typos, in and of themselves.
You trash KDE 4.0 here for being careless in design and/or execution, but you didn't even spend the extra 15-20 minutes to proofread this properly. When the pot is called out as black, you retreat with diversionary tactics, and adopt a "high road" posture.
Article? It reads like a blog post. I love the stuff on things like Menuet, Haiku, or the Nintendo OS; but there is just no end to UI nitpicking. Maybe it's time for introspection:
http://jmoiron.net/media/legacy/images/ss/the%20future%20of...





Member since:
2005-07-06
I stopped reading after encountering the following errors in the first few paragraphs
Continued reading didn't get any better...this was poor even by web standards. I am sure that Thom had something to say, I just couldn't focus through the lack of editing. This would be a fine first draft....
Which brings me to my point. It is pretty comical as it is basically a rant criticizing the lack of attention to detail in KDE...
Is it intentional farce?