Linked by Thom Holwerda on Thu 17th Jan 2008 20:44 UTC
Thread beginning with comment 296618
To read all comments associated with this story, please click here.
To read all comments associated with this story, please click here.
The review seemed like a balanced write-up that contained both positive and negative comments. Most of the critisisms, if true, were more balanced and relevent than the OSNews comments would have you believe.
The browser, for example. The writer wasn't just whining that his favorite browser wasn't included with the XO; he was highlighting browser features, really basic stuff, that were missing in the XO's browser choice.
I recommend you read the review for yourself.
I stopped reading at the "The browser should be replaced by Firefox" statement. Yeah. I can see in my imagination children waiting couple of minutes for it to open. Not mentioning the energy waste.
I didn't stop reading, but when he said that Opera was already available, IMHO probably the best portable browser out there(and certainly one of the best for low-power systems), I did think that his browser complaints were baseless and his review skewed.




Member since:
2006-06-17
I stopped reading at the "The browser should be replaced by Firefox" statement. Yeah. I can see in my imagination children waiting couple of minutes for it to open. Not mentioning the energy waste.