Linked by Eugenia Loli-Queru on Fri 18th Jan 2008 10:38 UTC, submitted by glyphobet
Thread beginning with comment 296775
To view parent comment, click here.
To read all comments associated with this story, please click here.
To view parent comment, click here.
To read all comments associated with this story, please click here.
RE[4]: Not sure why this is on OSNews
by Joe User on Fri 18th Jan 2008 23:59
in reply to "RE[3]: Not sure why this is on OSNews"
RE[4]: Not sure why this is on OSNews
by PlatformAgnostic on Sat 19th Jan 2008 05:24
in reply to "RE[3]: Not sure why this is on OSNews"
I'm pretty interested in this list of 44 vulns... can you point them out?
About the DRM... I'm sorry that it bothers you. If you really care, just don't run DRMed media, and nothing will happen. The alternative to the current state of affairs is that folks will start writing their own DRM software and destabilize your machine by doing unsafe operations (like the well-known Sony product, or another funny program that was using the Debug Registers for DRM purposes).
RE[5]: Not sure why this is on OSNews
by dylansmrjones on Sat 19th Jan 2008 05:46
in reply to "RE[4]: Not sure why this is on OSNews"






Member since:
2006-09-29
hahh... you must be Mike Cox in disguise.
The last I checked, Windows had 44 critical security vulnerabilities that have not been resolved.
I've complained about this, and also made feature requests to Microsoft regarding removal of DRM from Vista.
Microsoft hasn't fixed these bugs, or removed the DRM from Vista.
Using your logic - Windows sucks.