Linked by Thom Holwerda on Mon 21st Jan 2008 23:33 UTC
OS/2 and eComStation IBM pretty much slammed the solid oak door on open sourcing os/2. "As stated in our response to your September 2005 letter we have considered the positioning of os/2 and open source several times in the past, and for a variety of business, technical, and legal reasons we have decided to not pursue any os/2 open source projects."
Thread beginning with comment 297085
To read all comments associated with this story, please click here.
Just a guess ...
by tomcat on Mon 21st Jan 2008 23:45 UTC
tomcat
Member since:
2006-01-06

but ... IBM co-developed parts of OS/2 with MS, so there are probably contractual restrictions which would prevent IBM from releasing the source code.

Reply Score: 4

RE: Just a guess ...
by jonsmirl on Tue 22nd Jan 2008 00:27 in reply to "Just a guess ..."
jonsmirl Member since:
2005-07-06

You don't need to guess. I worked on this project. IBM is never going to be able to open source OS/2 unless Microsoft agrees. OS/2 contains complete details on SMB/CIFS something that Microsoft does not want public. Probability that Microsoft will agree to open sourcing OS/2 = zero.

Reply Parent Score: 13

RE[2]: Just a guess ...
by sbergman27 on Tue 22nd Jan 2008 00:32 in reply to "RE: Just a guess ..."
sbergman27 Member since:
2005-07-24

OS/2 contains complete details on SMB/CIFS something that Microsoft does not want public.


Then what did the PFIF just get from Microsoft for 14,000 euros? This year's Betty Crocker cookbook?

Edited 2008-01-22 00:33 UTC

Reply Parent Score: 6

RE[2]: Just a guess ...
by Lobotomik on Tue 22nd Jan 2008 07:12 in reply to "RE: Just a guess ..."
Lobotomik Member since:
2006-01-03

AND (at least in its day) a complete, better-than-Microsoft's, implementation of Windows. Now talk about MS opposing the publication of THAT.

Reply Parent Score: 2