Linked by Thom Holwerda on Mon 21st Jan 2008 23:33 UTC
OS/2 and eComStation IBM pretty much slammed the solid oak door on open sourcing os/2. "As stated in our response to your September 2005 letter we have considered the positioning of os/2 and open source several times in the past, and for a variety of business, technical, and legal reasons we have decided to not pursue any os/2 open source projects."
Thread beginning with comment 297176
To read all comments associated with this story, please click here.
And AIX ?
by shiva on Tue 22nd Jan 2008 12:48 UTC
shiva
Member since:
2007-01-24

In my opinion open the source code of OS/2 is not useful when now there are many other unix-based operating systems more powerful, more compatible with standards, more advanced in hardware support, etc available as free softwares.

And I don't believe that linux needs something of OS/2 code because wine can run more windows programs now than OS/2. And we are in the virtualization era and linux is perfect to run windows in virtual machines if you need it.

It would much more useful if IBM's AIX would become free software, like OpenSolaris.

It's too late for OS/2 and any other operating system not unix like or windows.

Edited 2008-01-22 12:51 UTC

Reply Score: 3

RE: And AIX ?
by sbergman27 on Tue 22nd Jan 2008 13:06 in reply to "And AIX ?"
sbergman27 Member since:
2005-07-24

It would much more useful if IBM's AIX would become free software, like OpenSolaris.


A FOSS AIX would probably be of limited usefulness. As I understand it, insanely tight integration with the hardware is one of its greatest strengths.

Rather than going through the intensive effort that opening AIX would require, I would prefer to see IBM invest the resources in adding some of AIX's more useful capabilities to existing FOSS OSes.

And do we really *need* another FOSS Unix? I'm all for 'coopetition' between multiple developer communities. But beyond a certain number of major players, the benefits of the competition become overshadowed by the fragmentation of developer resources.

Reply Parent Score: 4

RE[2]: And AIX ?
by signals on Tue 22nd Jan 2008 14:53 in reply to "RE: And AIX ?"
signals Member since:
2005-07-08

As I understand it, insanely tight integration with the hardware is one of its greatest strengths.

Really? I just left an IBM shop last year, and while I did not work as the sysadmin, the guy who did lead me to believe that modern IBM machines run AIX in a virtual machine called an LPAR.In fact, he told me that IBM's "best practice" for a machine that is only going to run one instance of AIX, is to run it inside an LPAR, and not on the bare metal.

I was under the impression that virtualization was IBM and AIX's big strength, not tight integration with the hardware...

Reply Parent Score: 1