To read all comments associated with this story, please click here.
The Windows UI is replaceable, even on Windows. That is not where the innovation is happening. Look beneath the skin - Windows has a lot of good points architecturally. There are many decent Windows programs as well. There is a lot of value to being able to support Windows without being beholden to it.
Keep up the good work, ReactOS team!
The ultimate goal of ReactOS is to make an operating system that is binary compatible with Microsoft Windows. This means that you will be able to use drivers and applications designed for Microsoft Windows in ReactOS.
If this goal is achieved, creating a new user interface is kind of trivial. Actually, you could use Blackbox for Windows, for example (http://www.bb4win.org/).
Another potential use for ReactOS is to offer legacy support for old Windows apps some time in the future.
In a few years time you may have some ancient crusty app that does something very important for your company, but for some reason doesn't run on the two latest versions of windows. You could either try to find an old, unsupported version of the latest version of windows that the program worked on and try to get that working on whatever hardware is around then. Or you can install the latest version of ReactOS, which has activly maintained and run your app on that.
That wouldn't be too hard a thing to do actually. Unlike the old days we have virtualisation solutions today that can create a hardware environment that the OS is certain to function on.
So whatever the real hardware may be at that time, you can still enjoy a nice and stable legacy OS that will, in the case of Windows, run better and more comfortable under virtualisation than on real hardware.
The licensing part remains, of course, and that's where ReactOS comes in. A free OS to run your application on, installed on either physical or virtual hardware.






Member since:
2007-02-17
I may be a little slow, but what is the point of making a clone of windows? I would think that with all the resources being spent on this that maybe they would instead try to make something better, perhaps more innovative, a different UI even.
I guess to each his own.
Edited 2008-01-22 21:54 UTC