Linked by Thom Holwerda on Wed 23rd Jan 2008 07:02 UTC, submitted by SEJeff
Thread beginning with comment 297370
To view parent comment, click here.
To read all comments associated with this story, please click here.
To view parent comment, click here.
To read all comments associated with this story, please click here.
RE[5]: Faulty business model
by wirespot on Wed 23rd Jan 2008 21:40
in reply to "RE[4]: Faulty business model"
RE[6]: Faulty business model
by yahya on Thu 24th Jan 2008 14:23
in reply to "RE[5]: Faulty business model"
He doesn't care. He was a mercenary, and he's getting his more than fair share out of the whole thing.
I assume he does. However at the same time, the whole story has probably damaged his reputation beyond repair. I would think that in the business world you can always live fine with a reputation of being amoral, greedy and so forth as long as you are successful. b
But if you are widely known to be a looser, you are finished, not?




Member since:
2007-03-29
If that is what he is, then one wonders how he could be so stupid thinking he could attack the nazgul (IBM's lawyers) without being properly armed.