Yesterday we reported on GoBE 
To view parent comment, click here.
To read all comments associated with this story, please click here.
Member since:2005-10-13
Yes, Qt can link to GPLv2, GPLv3, or code under any of the following licenses:
Academic Free License
2.0 or 2.1
Apache Software License
1.0 or 1.1
Apache License
2.0
Apple Public Source License
2.0
Artistic license
From Perl 5.8.0
BSD license
"July 22 1999"
Common Public License
1.0
GNU Library or "Lesser"
General Public License (LGPL)
2.0 or 2.1
Jabber Open Source License
1.0
MIT License
(as attached)
Mozilla Public License (MPL)
1.0 or 1.1
Open Software License
2.0
OpenSSL license (with original
SSLeay license) "2003" ("1998")
PHP License
3.0
Python license (CNRI Python License)
(as attached)
Python Software Foundation License
2.1.1
Q Public License
v1.0
Sleepycat License
"1999"
W3C License
"2001"
X11 License
X11R6.6
Zlib/libpng License
(as attached)
Zope Public License
2.0
I believe the KDE libraries are LGPL, or at least they used to be. I haven't heard anything about the newer ones so I would assume they are the same.
Edited 2008-01-23 15:59 UTC
Member since:
2006-03-05
If he writes "KDE", I would guess he means "KDE"... And that makes a lot of sense. I _know_ how much KDE delivers to the office suite builder on top of Qt.
Their current Linux port, the one they couldn't get stable is based on GTK1.
Just for the record, Qt is now also licensed under GPLv3 and comes with a host of licensing exceptions.