Linked by Eugenia Loli on Wed 23rd Jan 2008 22:07 UTC
Linux With Linux on the desktop going from a slow crawl to verging on an explosion, many have toiled with the question: How do we make this happen faster? A well-known Austin-based Linux Advocate thinks he has the answer.
Thread beginning with comment 297598
To view parent comment, click here.
To read all comments associated with this story, please click here.
RE[2]: Say no to drugs...
by raver31 on Thu 24th Jan 2008 17:34 UTC in reply to "RE: Say no to drugs..."
raver31
Member since:
2005-07-06

Another killer Linux app is Amarok.

Every Ubuntu install I am asked to do, (and they are increasing every day)....

It runs Gnome, but I type this...

sudo aptitude install k3b amarok gps gkrellm mc joe


then set /usr/bin/kdeinit and /usr/bin/gkrellm
as start up programs in session manager... lovely...

Anyway, Amarok, simply the best music application on any platform. Can't be beat.

Reply Parent Score: 2

RE[3]: Say no to drugs...
by Laurence on Thu 24th Jan 2008 19:29 in reply to "RE[2]: Say no to drugs..."
Laurence Member since:
2007-03-26

Anyway, Amarok, simply the best music application on any platform. Can't be beat.


That's only your opinion. I've tried it and personally found it overkill for when all I wanted was to listen to a few MP3s.

Personally I favour VLC for every day use (the bonus being it runs on all of my platforms) but then that's only my personal preference too.

Reply Parent Score: 1

RE[3]: Say no to drugs...
by WereCatf on Thu 24th Jan 2008 21:30 in reply to "RE[2]: Say no to drugs..."
WereCatf Member since:
2006-02-15

Another killer Linux app is Amarok.
[..]
Anyway, Amarok, simply the best music application on any platform. Can't be beat.


I don't really think it's such a "killer app". There are a whole range of good audio players for Linux. I personally like Rhythmbox the best. On Mac I would use iTunes. On my XP installation I also use iTunes but only because Rhythmbox isn't available and I don't know of any good similar Windows apps (and whoever is reading this, please, don't suggest anything resembling Winamp cos I just don't like those at all). Anyways, my case is just a good example here for why I consider porting apps to Windows A Good Thing (TM): I can then use familiar and high-quality apps under Windows too whenever the need arises for me to boot into Windows. That's why I find the suggestion of stopping porting apps to Windows inherently annoying: I am forced to boot to Windows from time to time anyway but then I would also be forced to turn to Windows-only apps cos the apps I would like to use are no longer available.

Reply Parent Score: 3