Linked by Thom Holwerda on Thu 24th Jan 2008 21:24 UTC, submitted by Adam S
Windows Supposedly, we are looking at screenshots of Windows 7 here. Anyone who has ever looked at Vista will realise these are exactly the same - and that actually makes a lot of sense, so early in a development cycle. In any case, the version number in the winver screenshot actually corresponds to the version number supposedly assigned to the supposedly released M1 build of Windows 7 - but hey, that's just a Photoshop away. Do with this as you please.
Thread beginning with comment 297747
To view parent comment, click here.
To read all comments associated with this story, please click here.
RE[2]: well..
by casuto on Fri 25th Jan 2008 10:41 UTC in reply to "RE: well.."
casuto
Member since:
2007-02-27

There already is a much more secure XP. It's called Windows 2003 and it's the best Windows release ever. Very recommendable.


Windows Vista is built on the Windows Server 2003 Service Pack 1 codebase.
Windows Vista SP1 will inerith the Windows 2008 Server's kernel

Edited 2008-01-25 10:44 UTC

Reply Parent Bookmark Score: 1

RE[3]: well..
by cmost on Fri 25th Jan 2008 11:20 in reply to "RE[2]: well.."
cmost Member since:
2006-07-16

The key phrase is "built on." I think Microsoft tried too hard to roll everything but the kitchen sink into Vista as it tried to make it the end-all be-all. What Microsoft should have done is the opposite and stripped away anything superfluous in order to create a lean, mean stable operating system. Unfortunately, Microsoft got burned with Vista because their over-reaching ambition created too many empty promises as their programmers were insufficient to meet the task. To compound the problem, Microsoft's marketing people decided to go hog wild in their attempt to maximize the gouging...er profits and that's how we arrived at Microsof's "Baskin Robbins" esque 31 flavors of Windows Vista. I think most users would agree that Vista contains too much. A cleaner, leaner OS is what's in order and let people pick and choose the extraneous features they need ala carte. In truth, this is how Microsoft will maximize it's profits AND keep customers happy.

Reply Parent Bookmark Score: 1

RE[4]: well..
by aesiamun on Fri 25th Jan 2008 14:33 in reply to "RE[3]: well.."
aesiamun Member since:
2005-06-29

Windows Server 2008 and Vista SP1 will be the same codebase.

So no, not based on...same code base

Reply Parent Bookmark Score: 2

RE[3]: well..
by stone on Fri 25th Jan 2008 12:31 in reply to "RE[2]: well.."
stone Member since:
2005-07-06

There already is a much more secure XP. It's called Windows 2003 and it's the best Windows release ever. Very recommendable.

Windows Vista is built on the Windows Server 2003 Service Pack 1 codebase.
Windows Vista SP1 will inerith the Windows 2008 Server's kernel


your post is misleading. while vista is built upon the window2003 codebase, it isnt the same as windows2003 improved. its still a new product.

also, while sp1 will include the slightly updated nt6.0 kernel, it already uses the nt6.0 kernel. windows2003 used the nt5.2 kernel.

/stone

Edited 2008-01-25 12:32 UTC

Reply Parent Bookmark Score: 1