Linked by Thom Holwerda on Thu 24th Jan 2008 22:35 UTC
Thread beginning with comment 297858
To view parent comment, click here.
To read all comments associated with this story, please click here.
To view parent comment, click here.
To read all comments associated with this story, please click here.
RE[3]: Actually looks pretty good...
by stestagg on Fri 25th Jan 2008 20:17
in reply to "RE[2]: Actually looks pretty good..."
You're right, lucidity is not always one of my strong points, and I was a little distracted this morning.
My only point is that for many people, the performance/speed/latency of the mythtv frontend/user interface is not great at all. So much so that my PPC mac-mini [running ubuntu] can't even properly cope with navigating the user interface, let alone playing back video/audio without major frame dropping. I know I am not alone in experiencing this, but maybe we are just a vocal minority of users.
RE[4]: Actually looks pretty good...
by galvanash on Fri 25th Jan 2008 22:36
in reply to "RE[3]: Actually looks pretty good..."
You're right, lucidity is not always one of my strong points, and I was a little distracted this morning.
My only point is that for many people, the performance/speed/latency of the mythtv frontend/user interface is not great at all. So much so that my PPC mac-mini [running ubuntu] can't even properly cope with navigating the user interface, let alone playing back video/audio without major frame dropping. I know I am not alone in experiencing this, but maybe we are just a vocal minority of users.
My only point is that for many people, the performance/speed/latency of the mythtv frontend/user interface is not great at all. So much so that my PPC mac-mini [running ubuntu] can't even properly cope with navigating the user interface, let alone playing back video/audio without major frame dropping. I know I am not alone in experiencing this, but maybe we are just a vocal minority of users.
Yeah... I cant argue with that. The UI isnt exactly glass smooth - even on a high-end system it still feels a bit sluggish. There are quite alot of tweaks that can be made to improve it, but its a pita...






Member since:
2006-01-25
Im not sure I am parsing your reply correctly, but Ill try. MythTV IS a good viewing interface (imo). The question is whether this chip is suitable for it. In a nutshell I'm saying that VIA's new chip mounted on a nano-ITX epia board _could_ be a wonderful platform for a MythTV frontend. The _could_ meaning there is basically a performance sweetspot for doing 720P decoding - and all this chip has to do is reach it with a bit of breathing room. I dont think it will be able to do 1080P, but 720P is definitely possible.
Not everyone cares about the same things. Many (if not most) people run Myth monolithically. Nothing wrong with that, but I prefer having my backend/tuners in a wiring closet and putting a frontend on each TV. A frontend the size of a small paperback book that can do 720P decoding for less than $400 would be pretty nice (for me anyway - to each his own).