Linked by Thom Holwerda on Mon 28th Jan 2008 09:33 UTC, submitted by anonymous
Thread beginning with comment 298074
To view parent comment, click here.
To read all comments associated with this story, please click here.
To view parent comment, click here.
To read all comments associated with this story, please click here.
> I wouldn't really say "at all cost" because Bochum was 6% of their
> production but 25% of costs.
This has been shown to be untrue. Nokia compared the costs of production and R&D in Bochum to just production elsewhere. Had they compared production in Bochum vs. production in Finnland, Bochum wouldn't have been less profitable:
http://www.focus.de/finanzen/news/betriebsrat_aid_235055.html (German)
Yes, that might be true (i don't read german too good). But you have to understand what Nokia means to Finnish people/economy. If they would shut down the factory in Salo, it would be quite a negative publicity for them here in Finland. Now at least they have pinch of image of being a Finnish company.






Member since:
2005-07-20
I'm also slightly worried by this annoucement.
I wouldn't really say "at all cost" because Bochum was 6% of their production but 25% of costs.